You’d think that an attorney wouldn’t have to buy a clue about the first amendment. She actually thinks that when leftwing publications refuse to publish radical feminist writers, it’s a form of censorship that violates first amendment rights!

“WORD” (as the young people say!)
A couple of days ago I was talking to a legal scholar who actually is fairly tepidly anti-porn, all things considered, and cripes has she gotten “pushback.” Why is it that the First Amendment is so generously embracing of porn, but so rigidly hostile to criticism of porn? BTW: Thank you for hosting one of the few blogs where I feel safe posting this!

Maybe Ann Bartow, radical feminist attorney who should know better, can show us examples of the government curtailing criticisms of porn. Hmmm?